Blog

This morning as I was running on the treadmill, I was also watching CNN. A story came on about a shooting in Washington D.C. The police chief was speaking with the mayor of D.C looking on. She stated that, “people are just ready for acts like this to stop.”  I didn’t get a chance to see who was involved in this latest incident of urban violence, but it led me to reflect on the violent acts committed in my own city of Minneapolis involving young African-Americans in most cases. This statement raises the question, “How do we stop the violence in our inner-cities?”

On one level we must address this issue from the standpoint of individual responsibility. Churches and other ministries must develop ministry initiatives, which deal head-on with the issue of violence as the primary means for solving conflict. Peace and nonviolence cannot be seen as an outdated strategy of Hippies and those who participated in the part of the Civil Rights Movement directed by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Many young people in the city lack a strategy free of violence to deal with loss, anger, stress, and not being able to have what you want immediately. Ministries to children, youth, and families must contain initiatives dealing with conflict resolution rooted in the teachings of Jesus. Jesus has something to say in Chapters 5-7 about conflict resolution and specifically on how to deal with enemies. These biblical principles must be contextualized for today. We can also look at chapter 3 of 1 John. Within this chapter John reminds us of what happens if our souls are not being driven by the love of God by pointing back to the story of Cain and Abel. What led to Cain killing his own brother is today at the root of violence in the city as well as the suburbs. The lack of being filled with Gods’ love through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit is a major factor in the ability to attempt to take the life of another human being. It’s also easier when you don’t see the other as just as much Gods’ beloved as you are. Sometimes the ability to attempt to take the life of another begins with not seeing oneself as the beloved of God.

The second factor that must be dealt with in order to deal with violence in the city is being willing to deal with the realities of class and race. What is behind so much violence in the city among so many African-Americans? There is a connection between poverty, race, relationships, and violence. To deny this is to ignore some root causes that go along with individual responsibility. Inner-cities are the way they are on purpose. The White Flight of the 60’s and 70’s play a role. The Educated Black Flight of the 80’s play a role as well. This is not a guilt trip for those in the suburbs for I live in the suburbs myself. The issue is figuring out how to live in the suburbs and still have a heart for the city. This was the place of Nehemiah in the Old Testament. It broke his heart to know the city of Jerusalem was in ruins and he took some of the responsibility for why this was the case. We must acknowledge the systemic issues behind urban violence and take responsibility as well. Those living outside the city must take responsibility and work with those in the city to be salt and light.

Nonviolence cannot be an ancient social strategy that was just good for a season. We must raise up an generation who are able to experience, “a peace that passes all understanding” that it might, “guard our hearts and minds.”

Comments

  • danderson - October 14, 2009

    I am heartened by Brother Efrem’s balanced approach and view of this profound problem. Too many on the Left see all sin as structural or societal, while those on the Right see sin as essentially personal. We need to view this problem as multi-faceted and complex.

    Over the past two years I’ve had close to a dozen African-Americans in my fifth grade classroom (The great majority have been Latino). I don’t think there’s been one of the 12 who lives in a two-parent family. When I occasionally ride the bus to work often times there are MF-bombs thrown out like it’s part of normal speech, both by teens and occasionally adults. It all seems hopeless at times, and I often feel a great sorrow. OTOH, I am heartened by ministries here that are trying to change lives, spiritually, economically and socially.

  • Mark Aamot - October 20, 2009

    Well said, Pastor E. I completely agree with finding a balance between personal responsibility and systemic justice. Neither can be realized without the other. Don’t judge others living in different circumstances than yours, and don’t use your own circumstances to justify doing things you know are just plain wrong.

    One thing I would add or challenge you to speak further on is the relationship between America being at war (to resolve problems?) and violence on America’s streets.

    For example, if you look at the history of violent gang activity in America, you see it spike in direct relationship to America’s wars. Most violent gangs formed, or became increasingly violent, toward the end of a war and in the immediate wake of a war. Gang violence spiked in the late 40s/early 50s (WW2/Korea), then again in the late 70s/early 80s (Viet Nam), then again in the mid 90s (Persian Gulf…remember “Murderapolis”?). It dropped off dramatically right after 911 (when America was the attacked, not the attacker)…and now it is rising again (Iraq and Afghanistan).

    How do we (the Church) interpret this pattern, and how do we (the Church) mentor our younger Brothers twoard peaceful problem solving against a backdrop of war? How do we reconcile our Nation being at war (in some cases STARTING the war) with teaching peaceful problem solving to a 15-year old Brother who doesn’t want to be punked out at school or at the corner store?

    If we are to teach a 15-year old that he is God’s Beloved, and this mug up the street he has negative feelings toward (perhaps even justified feelings) is equally God’s Beloved…well, then is it also true that another nation or people group America has “issues” with (justified or not) is also God’s Beloved?

    I’m not arguing that a 15-year old or America should simply ignore legitimate issues. But, if we are to teach a 15-year old that he should handle his issues with others in peace and respect, then wouldn’t it benefit all Americans to also advocate that AMERICA handle it’s issues with others in the same way? How do we teach one and not advocate the other?

    I’m having a hard time not being a hypocrite if I teach peace and responsibility in the personal arena and ignore it in the national/international arena. There sure seems to be a strong relationship between how America handles it’s issues with others and how America’s people handle our issues with each other. We need to get real about BOTH!

    Grace and Peace,
    Mark

  • David Maus - October 26, 2009

    AMEN to both Pastor and Mark. To Mark’s insightful comments, I would add the following:

    Look at where the military does their recruiting. It is no secret that recruiters target low-income communities where there are few other economic opportunities. Recruiters also target minorities. Now, when young men join the military, they are trained to kill — I don’t think this is a controversial assertion. What happens when their service is over? There is research and anecdotal evidence that suggests returning soldiers have difficulty reintegrating into their communities. Moreover, if significant economic development has not taken place in their communities, they will have just as much difficulty finding jobs as before they enlisted.
    We can talk about violence in rap music or movies or TV or wherever else you please, and that is undoubtedly a factor, but we need to address the fact that our government is training young black and brown men to be killing machines and then sending them back to the streets.

  • Barry Clemson - October 27, 2009

    The Myth of Redemptive Violence (Walter Wink) seems to me to be at the root of both our international (military) violence and our proclivity to murder each other. Many Americans are convinced that threats (or any kind of evil) can only be met with violence or submission. Jesus’ Third Way of nonviolence is not considered a realistic possibility. Rather, nonviolence is equated with cowardly submission.
    To cut thru that mindset, to get someone to seriously consider nonviolence is difficult. I use fiction to try to do so. My novel, Denmark Rising, pretends the Danes prepared to resist the Nazis in 1940 with strategic nonviolence. Fiction sort of sneaks past our beliefs and defenses and shows that nonviolence can be very powerful. And people who would never look at a scholarly or religious book on nonviolence will read a novel … and the novel changes their image of nonviolence.

  • Isjois - November 3, 2009

    Mark – great points!

    Our nation leans very heavily towards personal responsibility. We rarely hear the term “social responsibility”. While I understand this mentality in the secular world, I’m at a loss for why it is celebrated within our churches. Same goes for the “personal arena” versus the “national/international arena”.

    The Bible doesn’t condemn poor people, but our society and churches largely do. Too often pastors choose to be glib about the topic of economic issues. They have either bought into the prosperity gospel or belief that those who “work hard” will eventually succeed. The issue isn’t whether all people will eventually be “rewarded”, but the fact that our pastors aren’t forthright enough to tell congregations that some people will not see their “reward” until they get to heaven. This isn’t necessarily due to “God’s Will”, but – rather, it results from societal and individual greed and selfishness.

    For many dealing with poverty, it’s not a matter of “not being able to have what you want immediately”…it’s about not ever having what they need to thrive. We’re talking about individuals who can’t find safe and affordable housing…can’t afford healthy and nutritious food…can’t enable their children to attend acedemically strong schools…can’t purchase clothes that will allow them to look like their “neighbors”…can’t find a doctor who will accept medicaid…and so forth.

    MLK Jr. was willing to address systemic issues and oppression in our society. I pray that our pastors today will look beyond “personal responsibility” and “platitudes”. Perhaps they will learn the stories of those living in local poverty and fight for social programs that will enable all of our citizens to be the people God intended for them to be.

    Many wealthy and middle class Americans benefit from “God’s Welfare” – being born into an economically healthy family, who is able to ensure their children access the tools to establish their own financial success. We need our pastors to fight for those who require “social welfare” to put them closer in footing to those who were born into privilege. It’s disingenuous to ask the poor to act “better than” – or even “like” – their well-off “neighbors”. If you were hungry/homeless/ill-housed/under-educated/under-resourced/overwhelmed – how would YOU act?

    “God never intended for one group of people to live in superfluous inordinate wealth, while others live in abject deadening poverty. God intends for all of his children to have the basic necessities of life, and he has left in this universe “enough and to spare” for that purpose. So I call upon you to bridge the gulf between abject poverty and superfluous wealth.” (MLK Jr)

  • ariah - November 20, 2009

    Great points everyone about violence and war and military recruiting and the rest, I echo all of your sentiments.

    One thing recently that’s really impacted my thinking as it relates to youth violence is the work of the Peace Foundation and others in the city and county to argue for framing youth violence as a public health issue. It’s really a brilliant insight to properly change our perspective to the issue of youth violence. Youth violence, especially violence related to gangs and drugs in the city has often carried the stigma and stereotypes of criminal, no-good, wrong-doers. We place huge emphasis on personal responsibility for these youth and lend little grace.
    Now think about how we tend to think about issues like eating disorders, underage drinking or even H1N1. With eating disorders, we might recognize there is personal choice involved, but our response is way more grace filled, recognizing the many outside influencing factors, the deep struggles of that individual and the need for love and affection. We place a bit more responsibility on individuals regarding underage drinking, but it’s still season as a collective public health issue, so we spend thousands and millions of dollars on PSA’s and marketing encouraging youth to consider the dangers of underage drinking, to drink responsible, etc. H1N1 is a great recent example of addressing things issues of public health. H1N1 is spread due to individuals not being responsible for their health, not covering our cough and sneeze, not staying home the appropriate amount of days, not washing our hands, wearing masks, etc. Yet there is no stigma involved when you get H1N1 (I know, I’ve had it), we totally avoid the personal responsibility piece and work on nursing individuals back to health, spreading information publicly on what to watch for, how to care for yourselves, etc.

    Sorry for the long explanation, you can do a google search on youth violence as a public health issue and get some real information about it, but I just wanted to share a bit of insight as to how it’s really affected my perspective on the issue.

Leave a Comment

Categories

Search

Booking

To book Efrem Smith for a speaking engagement, please contact Kingdom Building Ministries at www.kbm.org

RSS Feeds